You
are visiting
www.rawfoodinfo.com
The
Seattle Times
January 9, 2003
Navy's
ammo has environmentalists, others up in arms
By Ray Rivera and Craig Welch
Seattle Times staff reporters
A United
Nations subcommission has asked for a ban on DU weapons, claiming they're inhumane.
The World Health Organization in January 2001 recommended further health-risk
studies. In January 2001, NATO declined to ban depleted-uranium weapons as requested
by Italy, Germany, Norway and Greece primarily under pressure from the
U.S.
U.S. Navy exercises that fire depleted-uranium rounds off the coast of Washington
have raised concerns among environmentalists, but Navy officials say the deep-ocean
operations pose no danger. The controversial munitions are used by all the services
for their armor-piercing capabilities. They are largely credited for the swift
and one-sided tank clashes in the 1991 Gulf War, where they were first used
in combat.
But for years, soldiers and civilians in several countries have feared ill health
effects from the
toxic metal, which is a byproduct of natural uranium when it's turned into nuclear
fuel for reactors. Iraqi doctors have blamed the material for a sharp increase
in cancer and birth defects following the war. U.S. veterans groups also believe
it may be linked to the mysterious Gulf War syndrome. And countries in Europe
have complained that the United States hasn't always been forthright about its
health risks.
The Navy uses the munitions in its Phalanx anti-missile-defense system that
sends thousands of 20mm depleted-uranium (DU) rounds into the air to knock down
incoming missiles. Essentally a large Gatling gun, Phalanx serves as a "last
ditch" defense if missile-to-missile systems fail to hit their target.
The guns fire 80 rounds a second, 3,000 rounds a minute.
The guns are required to be certified quarterly, which requires firing up to
300 rounds per gun over sea ranges, including a range about 40 miles west of
Neah Bay. That range is from 800 to 1,400 fathoms deep and abuts the Olympic
Coast National Marine Sanctuary. The rounds are 40 percent less radioactive
than naturally occurring uranium found in seawater, the Navy says. But Navy
officials say that as the rounds dissolve, they can't be distinguished from
background radiation.
The weapons are found on all surface ships, but the Navy has been slowly phasing
out DU rounds in favor of tungsten munitions, said Cmdr. Karen Sellers, spokeswoman
for the Navy's Pacific Northwest Region. She could not say why the Navy was
switching rounds. Navy officials could not say yesterday how often the Washington
range is used, but Sellers said most tests are done off the coast of California
or in the open sea.
Local peace activist Glen Milner learned of the tests after obtaining an internal
Navy memo dated June 25, 2001, giving the Everett-based destroyer USS Fife the
green light to conduct gunnery operations. "How can the Navy fire depleted-uranium
rounds and spread radioactive material into prime fishing areas off our coast?"
asked Dave Mann, a Seattle environmental attorney. A coalition of peace and
environmental groups is considering filing an injunction to stop future DU operations
off the coast.
The
Department of Defense has sent mixed signals. In 1993, the military required
all soldiers participating in exercises involving DU to be tested for DU and
related oxide particles in the feces, said Dr. Doug Rokke, a former Army health
physicist and opponent of DU use. At the same time, the military says there
is no evidence showing the material is dangerous. "First off, when you
fire the Navy Phalanx, you're going to have DU contamination on the end of the
barrel and on the ship where they're fired," Rokke said. "These things
are fired thousands of rounds a minute, and if you're near any sanctuary that's
simply irresponsible, you simply don't take solid radioactive waste and throw
it in somebody's back yard." DU is only mildly radioactive, but it has
a half-life of 4.5 billion years. And the Pentagon revealed two years ago that
some DU munitions were contaminated with more highly radioactive substances,
such as plutonium.
Defense analysts also question whether the munitions are toxic.
"The science is not clear here," said Patrick Garrett, an associate
analyst with GlobalSecurity.Org, a Washington D.C.-based think tank. "The
military tells you these things are OK unless you're on the receiving end of
this weapon, but civilians and other doctors and scientists have been looking
at this issue and screaming bloody murder about it for a long time, and it's
not readily apparent what the long-term health impacts are."
A United Nations subcommission has asked for a ban on DU weapons, claiming they're
inhumane. The World Health Organization in January 2001 recommended further
health-risk studies. In January 2001, NATO declined to ban depleted-uranium
weapons as requested by Italy, Germany, Norway and Greece primarily under
pressure from the U.S.
In 1999, Canadian fishermen were outraged to learn the Canadian navy had left
several tons of depleted uranium on the ocean floor off the coast of Nova Scotia.
The radioactive rounds were fired from ships with Phalanx weapons systems. The
navy insisted there was no danger.
Back to Articles/Earth Mother & Environment
Home |
New to Raw?
|
Hotline |
Action Forum |
|
Multi/Media |
Events |
Press/Media
|