You
are visiting
www.rawfoodinfo.com
Independent
UK
Monday 26 April 2004
Lawyers
Try to Gag FBI Worker over 9/11
By Andrew Buncombe
The Bush administration will today seek to prevent a
former FBI translator from providing evidence about 11 September intelligence
failures to a group of relatives and survivors who have accused international
banks and officials of aiding al-Qa'ida.
Sibel Edmonds was subpoenaed by a law firm representing
more than 500 family members and survivors of the attacks to testify that she
had seen information proving there was considerable evidence before September
2001 that al-Qa'ida was planning to strike the US with aircraft. The lawyers
made their demand after reading comments Mrs Edmonds had made to The Independent.
But the US Justice Department is seeking to stop her
from testifying, citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".
Today in a federal court in Washington, senior government lawyers will try to
gag Mrs Edmonds, claiming that disclosure of her evidence "would cause
serious damage to the national security and foreign policy interests of the
United States".
Mrs Edmonds, 33, a Turkish-American who had top secret
security clearance, claimed this month that while working in the FBI's Washington
headquarters, she saw information proving senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida
plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes. She has provided
sworn testimony to the independent panel appointed by President George Bush
to investigate the circumstances surrounding 11 September.
Mrs Edmonds was subpoenaed by the law firm Motley-Rice,
which represents hundreds of families who are taking civil action against a
number of banks and two members of the Saudi royal family for allegedly aiding
al-Qa'ida.
Her lawyer, Mark Zaid, said last night: "The FBI
wants to shut her up completely." He said it was ridiculous to claim that
everything Mrs Edmonds knew had national security implications. Rather, he said,
the FBI wanted to silence his client to save its embarrassment.
The Bush administration has been put on the back foot
by allegations that senior officials - perhaps even Mr Bush himself - were provided
with considerable information warning of an imminent attack by al-Qa'ida and
that they failed to act. Mrs Edmonds said yesterday: "What are they are
afraid of? If I am not allowed to give evidence, the families will not get the
information I have; that will be that."
She said it was wrong for the Bush administration to
claim it wanted a full investigation. "If there is transparency, there
is going to be accountability and that is what they don't want."
Back to Articles/Government & Politics
Home |
New to
Raw? |
Hotline |
Action Forum |
|
Multi/Media |
Events |
Press/Media
|